Everything You Always Wanted to Know About Wikipedia* (*But Were Afraid to Ask)


I found that a lot of people outside of Wikipedia (and a lot of them inside) don’t know to use Wikipedia. And, of course, I found that they are afraid to ask 🙂 Even the name of the article refers only to Wikipedia, this document will deal with all Wikimedia-related issues. Document is in the FAQ form and I’ll expand it in the future. Ideas, suggestions and contributions are welcome.

The name of the document is given after Woody Allen’s movie Everything You Always Wanted to Know About Sex* (*But Were Afraid to Ask), of course. This is because of parallels between the movie and my ideas how to make this document:

  1. Wikipedia is like sex.
    • (Almost) all of us know what Wikipedia and sex are, but a lot of us don’t know how to use them.
    • When you learn how to use them, you will/did find that it is very easy. And you think that you were stupid because you didn’t learn it before.
    • Like with sex, you have to do a lot of things before you have Wikipedia (cf. petting vs. research).
    • You have to do a lot of things to keep your Wikipedia, too.
    • There are a lot of irritant people who want to take your Wikipedia from you.
    • (this is the place for your contribution: send to me your metaphors 🙂 )
  2. General FAQs without humor are boring. So, I want to try to be a little bit funny 😉
  3. I like grotesque humor.
  4. (there is a number of other parallels and I’ll add them here in the future)

Note that this FAQ represents my opinions, not opinions of Wikipedian community or Wikimedia Foundation or anyone else, even I am sure that there are a lot of people who agree with me. Because of that I didn’t decide to contribute it directly to Wikipedia FAQ (even all of this document may be adopted into Wikipedia).

Contributions, forks and translations

I would be happy to see any of them. Here are some notes for people who are interested in working on document like this one:


If you have some question and answer, send me an email and say there that you agree to give your contribution under GPLv3 or any later, GFDLv1.2 or any later or CC-BY-SAv3.0 or any later (for details, see the section “Copyleft”).

This section is the place where I will put all people who contributed. Every non-trivial contribution means that I’ll put you as authors of the document.


Feel free to fork this document. I would ask you to do two things: (1) send me a link to your document and I’ll put it here; (2) please, use all three licenses because it allows the highest level of usefulness of the document; keep in mind that I may want to adopt some of your Q&As 🙂


Feel free to translate this document. However, I encourage you not to make simple translation, but to make your own document. Thinking about this matter is a creative process and it is not so clever to waste your creative time on trivial translation.

Of course, as for forks, please: (1) send me a link to your document and (2) please, use all three licenses.

Versions and formats

The latest version of this document is available on my blog. From version 1.2 all of the documents are available in html and wiki.txt format on SourceForge (the full list of available documents with some explanations is available on my site).

  1. version 1.0 — 2007-08-04 — initial version
  2. version 1.0.1 — 2007-08-04 — spelling errors
  3. version 1.0.2 — 2007-08-04 — minor edits
  4. version 1.1 — 2007-08-04 — (1) link to Geoff’s page added; (2) four new Q&As added.
  5. version 1.2 — 2007-08-05
    • Better organization of the document.
    • Copyright statements and licenses added.
    • Links added into previous text.
    • A number of smaller changes.
    • A number of new Q&As.
  6. version 1.2.1 — 2007-08-05
    • Spelling errors and similar.


  • Add more content:
    • usage of article history in research
    • partisans on Wikipedia
    • more q&as at “Questions about life and meaning”


Document may be used under GPLv3, GFDLv1.2 or CC-BY-SA 3.0 or under any later version of those licenses provided by Free software foundation (for GPL and GFDL) and Creative Commons (for CC-BY-SA).


FAQ about WikipediaCopyright (C) 2007 Milos Rancic

This program is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free Software Foundation, either version 3 of the License, or at your option) any later version.

This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License for more details.

You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/&gt;.


Copyright (c) 2007 Milos Rancic.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this documentunder the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts. A copy of the license is included in the section entitled “GNUFree Documentation License”.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License.

Before you start to read

Note that there is an extensive FAQ on English Wikipedia which covers the most basic things. From time to time I’ll tell you to read this FAQ instead to write the same explanation here. But, when I think that some answers are appropriate for this document, I’ll cite them here.

In comparison to the FAQ from Wikipedia, intentions of this document are:

  1. To be a little bit more interesting then strictly functional FAQ.
  2. To cover almost the whole field of WP:FAQ, but not necessarily.
  3. To cover a number of issues which are not covered by Wikipedia FAQ. Some of them will/should be added into the official FAQ, but some of them is not possible to add because not all Wikipedia editors agree with my positions.
  4. To give an alternative opinion to official suggestions.
  5. As this is not a document which passed through process of consensus-making decisions, my intention is to make it clearly progressive.

And, in comarison to the official FAQ, intentions of this document are not:

  1. As this is not an official FAQ, I don’t intend to tell you who should be contacted if there is some copyright infringement or similar.
  2. I will not explain wiki editing basics here, but I’ll introduce you where to read it.
  3. My opinions may be different then widely accepted ones.
  4. Intention of this document is not to describe general computer techniques, like, for example, usage of spell checker in web browser is.


Wikipedia, Wikimedia, free knowledge, wiki

What is Wikipedia?

Wikipedia is a free knowledge project. Here is an approximate quote of the first paragraph of the article Wikipedia from Wikipedia (from August 5th, 2007:
Wikipedia (IPA: /ˌwikiˈpiːdi.ə/, /ˌwikiˈpeːdi.ə/ or /ˌwɪkiˈpiːdi.ə/) is a multilingual, web-based, free encyclopedia project, operated by the Wikimedia Foundation, a non-profit organization.

What is free knowledge?

According to the article on Wikipedia (2007-08-05), Libre/free knowledge is knowledge which may be acquired, interpreted and applied freely, it can be re-formulated according to one’s needs, and shared with others for community benefit.

It is free, but how much money I have to give for it?

It is free, you don’t need to pay anything! Of course, if you have Internet connection (payed or free) and computer (payed or free).

It looks like communism, I don’t like it!

Yes, it does, but you are mixing up communism with authoritarian people and totalitarian states which misused and misuse human aspirations for sharing.

But, “communism is an ideology that forces people to share”!

Every state does that. If you don’t pay tax, every state wants to put you into a jail.

Are you a Commie?

No, I am not a communist.

Does it have any relation with free software?

Yes. Wikipedia uses GNU Free Documentation License and free knowledge on Internet has roots in free software movement.

So, free knowledge is in relation with pirate software?

Yes, it is, but not as you think. Free software is not pirate software because free software is completely legal and free. However, people who like to share their knowledge legally, often sympathize people who share any kind of data legally or illegally.

You want to tell me that illegal share of software (and music? and movies?) is something good?

Yes, I want to tell you that. Sharing is a good thing. People who prohibit sharing are evil and prohibition of sharing is evil.

All of those things look like something ideal, not real. It may not work!

It works. Sharing knowledge between humans is working for a couple of millions of years.

How reliable Wikipedia is?

I want to cite Wikipedia article in my school work. How to do that?

Don’t do that! You shouldn’t cite even Britannica in your school work because it is an encyclopedia. And encyclopedia should be used for getting general knowledge, not for getting quotes for school nor scientific work.
(I strictly disagree with citing any encyclopedia. However some people think that it is possible to cite encyclopedia in some cases. You may be interested to read Geoffrey Burling’s article “When to cite from encyclopedia — even though you’re not suppose to“.)

So, you want to tell me that Wikipedia is useless for me?

If you want to get instant citations all encyclopedias are useless for you. If you want to explore some specific scientific field, Wikipedia (as well as any other encyclopedia) will be very useful for you. You may find there a lot of references which you may cite.

Oh my God, I saw this and this on Wikipedia!

Be cool 🙂 Someone wanted to make a joke and (s)he succeed. Wikipedia is edited by a lot of persons; search engines have their own algorithms. It is quite possible that Google catch 10,000 nonsense articles from two millions of articles. Keep in mind that this is 0.5% of articles on English language edition of Wikipedia.

OK. It was almost funny, but much bigger problem are pages like this one How can I trust to this site?

You shouldn’t trust to any site if you saw the information only on that site. But this is not the end. You shouldn’t believe to any newspaper, to your friends, even to your family members if they told to you something which is not possible to check. Even a wide spread informations may be hoaxes. For example, I live in Belgrade and I know the person who made ” this hoax (no, there were no any cafe “Osama” in Belgrade, even the explanation is completely rational; and, of course, you should check my claim somehow 🙂 ).

So, you are trying to tell to me not to trust to anyone?

Of course, not! You should believe to your friends and family members if they are talking to you about, for example, their emotions, what did they do yesterday and so on. You should believe to your professor when he teaches you.
Maybe they are wrong even if they think they are right. Maybe you will think something wrong because of that. But, what that’s mean: if something is really important to you, then you should check it not only twice. Except emotions, of course. If you don’t trust to someone’s emotions, it is useless to check them because trust is an important part of your emotions.

Let’s back to Wikipedia. Why should I use it when it is reliable as any other site?

Wikipedia becomes more reliable source then any other site, actually. Some time ago Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason made a perfect MediaWiki extension, Cite. This extension brought to Wikipedia (but, to other MediaWiki sites, too) an (almost) easy way to add references. Ta bu shi da yu made a template {{fact}} and maybe the most famous feature on Wikipedia became [citation needed]. As I don’t want to say that Wikipedia is now (August 2007) the encyclopedia with the most citations per article, I just say that Wikipedia will be the encyclopedia with the most citations per article in the near future. And citations makes one encyclopedia reliable.

Despite this, a lot of statements doesn’t have citations, still!

Yes, it is one of the Wikipedian problems. It is more easy just to write, then to make an appropriate research. Also, a method for adding relevant sources was not always so easy. And, all in all, Wikipedia didn’t start as a project with intent to become the biggest encyclopedia ever, but as an amateur project which goal was to help Nupedia, an expert project. So, there are at least two answers to this statement: (1) If you wait long enough (maybe a day, maybe a year, but I am sure not longer then a couple of years), at the end you will find appropriate citation at the place where you needed it. (2) If you don’t have a time to wait, find citation on some other place and compare it with text on Wikipedia. If statement on Wikipedia is wrong, please change it and add your source.

I found a lot of articles which cite irrelevant sources. If it is so, Wikipedia is irrelevant, too!

This is one more Wikipedian problem, but this doesn’t mean that Wikipedia is irrelevant. At least because “a lot” may mean “1% of sources”. A lot of people are coming to Wikipedia with an idea to enlighten the world with their positions and their ideas. A lot of Wikipedia editors are working a lot with such people. However, the number of articles is so big and editors’ free time is not indefinite. Because of that important articles doesn’t have such problems, but a lot of smaller articles which describes some not well known facts may have such problems. The answer on this claim is not easy. Wikipedians need to find a method how to deal with that. I have some ideas. The first and the most important is that there shouldn’t be added any new sentence without a reliable reference; and to start with fixing present articles. The second is to make a database of references and to automatically exclude claims with citations of references marked as non-reliable. I am sure that other Wikipedians have good ideas, too. And I am sure that this problem will be solved in the future. Of course, if you have some good idea, please let us know.

I need that article

I didn’t find an article about first order kinetics on Wikipedia and I need it!

What a good opportunity to make your first contribution to the sum of human knowledge! Please, find some sources and write the article.

You are so customer-unfriendly! I will never use your services again!

Wikipedia is not a company which provides services to it’s customers. Wikipedia is built over voluntary work of it’s users. And you are one of Wikipedia’s users. If you need such article on Wikipedia and you don’t know how to write it, ask someone to help you or to write the article.

So, I asked you to write the article!

Sorry, my knowledge about nuclear chemistry is very poor. I just found a red link on Wikipedia to make an example 😉

And if I ask you to help me to write the article?

Yes, I may help you. However, keep in mind that almost for sure you are know subject much better then then me. I may help you providing to you relevant methods for work on Wikipedia. If it is hard for you to read help pages on Wikipedia, you may contact me via email, via IRC (my nick is “millosh”, of course) or via Jabber (millosh@jabber.org). If you don’t find me, feel free to ask people on the channel. Also, I hope that this FAQ will be enough for the beginning in the future.

Questions about life and meaning

Is it possible that Wikipedia describes everything?

Yes. If Wikipedia makes another, double-density universe.

When Wikipedia would be finished?

Wikipedia was finished at July 29th, 2007.
It is possible to analyze this question more serious. Some of the circumstances may be enough to finish Wikipedia:

  • Any kind of global problems may cause a lot of problems to Wikipedia and even closing it. Wikipedia lays on Internet and any problem which may affect Internet, may affect Wikipedia, too: from global economic problems to some bigger cataclysm. Also, some global problems may be enough hard to destroy work on Wikipedia, but not to destroy Internet.
  • Any kind of restrictive legislature which would prohibit free cooperation between people may also close Wikipedia.
  • Some new technology (like very good manipulation and archiving sound and video) may switch contributors’ attention from Wikipedia to some new site/method. However, this kind of advance may bring only switching Wikipedia from text to some other medium.
  • Some radically new technology (like direct interchanging thoughts between humans) may cause that Wikipedia has no sense anymore. Again, even then Wikipedia may become a good starting position.
  • Some other reasons may be also responsible for closing Wikipedia: humans loose interest in knowledge, society comes at the position where knowledge is not important anymore, some pandemic makes incapable to use computers; etc.
  • Wikimedia Foundation stops to function. This event will probably just switch content from WMF to some other, new or existing organization.
  • Wikipedia policy in conjunction with large content makes impossible making new articles and developing existing. This will be the only circumstance which would make Wikipedia really finished.
All in all, if world survives and if world wouldn’t become some really different place from one which we know, it is not so reasonable to suppose that (at least the content and methods of) Wikipedia will be finished in our lives.

If you didn’t read introduction

Is there any connection between Wikipedia and sex?

Yes. Wikipedia is like sex.

I have a good idea to contribute to this document! Would you put it inside?

Yes, if I think that your contribution is at least informative or funny. If I didn’t find it informative or funny, you always may make your own fork of this document and, if you send me a link, I’ll link your document from this one.

May I make a fork of this document?

Yes, please! You may choose any of the licenses (GPL, GFDL, CC-BY-SA, please look at the section “Copyleft” for more details), but I am asking you to use all three licenses because of compatibility and usefulness of your document. Please, send me a link to your fork so I may add it in this document.

May I translate this document?

Yes, please! Note that I would like to see not only your simple translation, but your ideas, too. It is not necessary to make perfect translation of the document into another language; moreover, it is much better to have different documents! Also, please, try to keep all three licenses and send to me a link to your document.

Notes about writing this document

  • Section “I need that article” as it looked like in the version 1.2 of this document is an adaptation of my conversation with one Mac fan.
  • David Gerard sent to wikien-l list a link to UnNews article Wikipedia “reached completition”, site founder says. This email triggered the section “Questions about life and meaning”. I realized that this is an important part of the field which I intend to cover with this document.


GNU General Public License


GNU Free Documentation License

GNU Free Documentation License
Version 1.2, November 2002

Copyright (C) 2000,2001,2002  Free Software Foundation, Inc.
51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA  02110-1301  USA
Everyone is permitted to copy and distribute verbatim copies
of this license document, but changing it is not allowed.


The purpose of this License is to make a manual, textbook, or other
functional and useful document "free" in the sense of freedom: to
assure everyone the effective freedom to copy and redistribute it,
with or without modifying it, either commercially or noncommercially.
Secondarily, this License preserves for the author and publisher a way
to get credit for their work, while not being considered responsible
for modifications made by others.

This License is a kind of "copyleft", which means that derivative
works of the document must themselves be free in the same sense.  It
complements the GNU General Public License, which is a copyleft
license designed for free software.

We have designed this License in order to use it for manuals for free
software, because free software needs free documentation: a free
program should come with manuals providing the same freedoms that the
software does.  But this License is not limited to software manuals;
it can be used for any textual work, regardless of subject matter or
whether it is published as a printed book.  We recommend this License
principally for works whose purpose is instruction or reference.


This License applies to any manual or other work, in any medium, that
contains a notice placed by the copyright holder saying it can be
distributed under the terms of this License.  Such a notice grants a
world-wide, royalty-free license, unlimited in duration, to use that
work under the conditions stated herein.  The "Document", below,
refers to any such manual or work.  Any member of the public is a
licensee, and is addressed as "you".  You accept the license if you
copy, modify or distribute the work in a way requiring permission
under copyright law.

A "Modified Version" of the Document means any work containing the
Document or a portion of it, either copied verbatim, or with
modifications and/or translated into another language.

A "Secondary Section" is a named appendix or a front-matter section of
the Document that deals exclusively with the relationship of the
publishers or authors of the Document to the Document's overall subject
(or to related matters) and contains nothing that could fall directly
within that overall subject.  (Thus, if the Document is in part a
textbook of mathematics, a Secondary Section may not explain any
mathematics.)  The relationship could be a matter of historical
connection with the subject or with related matters, or of legal,
commercial, philosophical, ethical or political position regarding

The "Invariant Sections" are certain Secondary Sections whose titles
are designated, as being those of Invariant Sections, in the notice
that says that the Document is released under this License.  If a
section does not fit the above definition of Secondary then it is not
allowed to be designated as Invariant.  The Document may contain zero
Invariant Sections.  If the Document does not identify any Invariant
Sections then there are none.

The "Cover Texts" are certain short passages of text that are listed,
as Front-Cover Texts or Back-Cover Texts, in the notice that says that
the Document is released under this License.  A Front-Cover Text may
be at most 5 words, and a Back-Cover Text may be at most 25 words.

A "Transparent" copy of the Document means a machine-readable copy,
represented in a format whose specification is available to the
general public, that is suitable for revising the document
straightforwardly with generic text editors or (for images composed of
pixels) generic paint programs or (for drawings) some widely available
drawing editor, and that is suitable for input to text formatters or
for automatic translation to a variety of formats suitable for input
to text formatters.  A copy made in an otherwise Transparent file
format whose markup, or absence of markup, has been arranged to thwart
or discourage subsequent modification by readers is not Transparent.
An image format is not Transparent if used for any substantial amount
of text.  A copy that is not "Transparent" is called "Opaque".

Examples of suitable formats for Transparent copies include plain
ASCII without markup, Texinfo input format, LaTeX input format, SGML
or XML using a publicly available DTD, and standard-conforming simple
HTML, PostScript or PDF designed for human modification.  Examples of
transparent image formats include PNG, XCF and JPG.  Opaque formats
include proprietary formats that can be read and edited only by
proprietary word processors, SGML or XML for which the DTD and/or
processing tools are not generally available, and the
machine-generated HTML, PostScript or PDF produced by some word
processors for output purposes only.

The "Title Page" means, for a printed book, the title page itself,
plus such following pages as are needed to hold, legibly, the material
this License requires to appear in the title page.  For works in
formats which do not have any title page as such, "Title Page" means
the text near the most prominent appearance of the work's title,
preceding the beginning of the body of the text.

A section "Entitled XYZ" means a named subunit of the Document whose
title either is precisely XYZ or contains XYZ in parentheses following
text that translates XYZ in another language.  (Here XYZ stands for a
specific section name mentioned below, such as "Acknowledgements",

"Dedications", "Endorsements", or "History".)  To "Preserve the Title"
of such a section when you modify the Document means that it remains a
section "Entitled XYZ" according to this definition.

The Document may include Warranty Disclaimers next to the notice which
states that this License applies to the Document.  These Warranty
Disclaimers are considered to be included by reference in this
License, but only as regards disclaiming warranties: any other
implication that these Warranty Disclaimers may have is void and has
no effect on the meaning of this License.


You may copy and distribute the Document in any medium, either
commercially or noncommercially, provided that this License, the
copyright notices, and the license notice saying this License applies
to the Document are reproduced in all copies, and that you add no other
conditions whatsoever to those of this License.  You may not use
technical measures to obstruct or control the reading or further
copying of the copies you make or distribute.  However, you may accept
compensation in exchange for copies.  If you distribute a large enough
number of copies you must also follow the conditions in section 3.

You may also lend copies, under the same conditions stated above, and
you may publicly display copies.


If you publish printed copies (or copies in media that commonly have
printed covers) of the Document, numbering more than 100, and the
Document's license notice requires Cover Texts, you must enclose the
copies in covers that carry, clearly and legibly, all these Cover
Texts: Front-Cover Texts on the front cover, and Back-Cover Texts on
the back cover.  Both covers must also clearly and legibly identify
you as the publisher of these copies.  The front cover must present
the full title with all words of the title equally prominent and
visible.  You may add other material on the covers in addition.
Copying with changes limited to the covers, as long as they preserve
the title of the Document and satisfy these conditions, can be treated
as verbatim copying in other respects.

If the required texts for either cover are too voluminous to fit
legibly, you should put the first ones listed (as many as fit
reasonably) on the actual cover, and continue the rest onto adjacent

If you publish or distribute Opaque copies of the Document numbering
more than 100, you must either include a machine-readable Transparent
copy along with each Opaque copy, or state in or with each Opaque copy
a computer-network location from which the general network-using
public has access to download using public-standard network protocols
a complete Transparent copy of the Document, free of added material.
If you use the latter option, you must take reasonably prudent steps,
when you begin distribution of Opaque copies in quantity, to ensure
that this Transparent copy will remain thus accessible at the stated
location until at least one year after the last time you distribute an
Opaque copy (directly or through your agents or retailers) of that
edition to the public.

It is requested, but not required, that you contact the authors of the
Document well before redistributing any large number of copies, to give
them a chance to provide you with an updated version of the Document.


You may copy and distribute a Modified Version of the Document under
the conditions of sections 2 and 3 above, provided that you release
the Modified Version under precisely this License, with the Modified
Version filling the role of the Document, thus licensing distribution
and modification of the Modified Version to whoever possesses a copy
of it.  In addition, you must do these things in the Modified Version:

A. Use in the Title Page (and on the covers, if any) a title distinct
from that of the Document, and from those of previous versions
(which should, if there were any, be listed in the History section
of the Document).  You may use the same title as a previous version
if the original publisher of that version gives permission.
B. List on the Title Page, as authors, one or more persons or entities
responsible for authorship of the modifications in the Modified
Version, together with at least five of the principal authors of the
Document (all of its principal authors, if it has fewer than five),
unless they release you from this requirement.
C. State on the Title page the name of the publisher of the
Modified Version, as the publisher.
D. Preserve all the copyright notices of the Document.
E. Add an appropriate copyright notice for your modifications
adjacent to the other copyright notices.
F. Include, immediately after the copyright notices, a license notice
giving the public permission to use the Modified Version under the
terms of this License, in the form shown in the Addendum below.
G. Preserve in that license notice the full lists of Invariant Sections
and required Cover Texts given in the Document's license notice.
H. Include an unaltered copy of this License.
I. Preserve the section Entitled "History", Preserve its Title, and add
to it an item stating at least the title, year, new authors, and
publisher of the Modified Version as given on the Title Page.  If
there is no section Entitled "History" in the Document, create one
stating the title, year, authors, and publisher of the Document as
given on its Title Page, then add an item describing the Modified
Version as stated in the previous sentence.
J. Preserve the network location, if any, given in the Document for
public access to a Transparent copy of the Document, and likewise
the network locations given in the Document for previous versions
it was based on.  These may be placed in the "History" section.
You may omit a network location for a work that was published at
least four years before the Document itself, or if the original
publisher of the version it refers to gives permission.
K. For any section Entitled "Acknowledgements" or "Dedications",
Preserve the Title of the section, and preserve in the section all
the substance and tone of each of the contributor acknowledgements
and/or dedications given therein.
L. Preserve all the Invariant Sections of the Document,
unaltered in their text and in their titles.  Section numbers
or the equivalent are not considered part of the section titles.
M. Delete any section Entitled "Endorsements".  Such a section
may not be included in the Modified Version.
N. Do not retitle any existing section to be Entitled "Endorsements"

or to conflict in title with any Invariant Section.
O. Preserve any Warranty Disclaimers.

If the Modified Version includes new front-matter sections or
appendices that qualify as Secondary Sections and contain no material
copied from the Document, you may at your option designate some or all
of these sections as invariant.  To do this, add their titles to the
list of Invariant Sections in the Modified Version's license notice.
These titles must be distinct from any other section titles.

You may add a section Entitled "Endorsements", provided it contains
nothing but endorsements of your Modified Version by various
parties--for example, statements of peer review or that the text has
been approved by an organization as the authoritative definition of a

You may add a passage of up to five words as a Front-Cover Text, and a
passage of up to 25 words as a Back-Cover Text, to the end of the list
of Cover Texts in the Modified Version.  Only one passage of
Front-Cover Text and one of Back-Cover Text may be added by (or
through arrangements made by) any one entity.  If the Document already
includes a cover text for the same cover, previously added by you or
by arrangement made by the same entity you are acting on behalf of,
you may not add another; but you may replace the old one, on explicit
permission from the previous publisher that added the old one.

The author(s) and publisher(s) of the Document do not by this License
give permission to use their names for publicity for or to assert or
imply endorsement of any Modified Version.


You may combine the Document with other documents released under this
License, under the terms defined in section 4 above for modified
versions, provided that you include in the combination all of the
Invariant Sections of all of the original documents, unmodified, and
list them all as Invariant Sections of your combined work in its
license notice, and that you preserve all their Warranty Disclaimers.

The combined work need only contain one copy of this License, and
multiple identical Invariant Sections may be replaced with a single
copy.  If there are multiple Invariant Sections with the same name but
different contents, make the title of each such section unique by
adding at the end of it, in parentheses, the name of the original
author or publisher of that section if known, or else a unique number.
Make the same adjustment to the section titles in the list of
Invariant Sections in the license notice of the combined work.

In the combination, you must combine any sections Entitled "History"
in the various original documents, forming one section Entitled
"History"; likewise combine any sections Entitled "Acknowledgements",
and any sections Entitled "Dedications".  You must delete all sections
Entitled "Endorsements".


You may make a collection consisting of the Document and other documents
released under this License, and replace the individual copies of this
License in the various documents with a single copy that is included in
the collection, provided that you follow the rules of this License for
verbatim copying of each of the documents in all other respects.

You may extract a single document from such a collection, and distribute
it individually under this License, provided you insert a copy of this
License into the extracted document, and follow this License in all
other respects regarding verbatim copying of that document.


A compilation of the Document or its derivatives with other separate
and independent documents or works, in or on a volume of a storage or
distribution medium, is called an "aggregate" if the copyright
resulting from the compilation is not used to limit the legal rights
of the compilation's users beyond what the individual works permit.
When the Document is included in an aggregate, this License does not
apply to the other works in the aggregate which are not themselves
derivative works of the Document.

If the Cover Text requirement of section 3 is applicable to these
copies of the Document, then if the Document is less than one half of
the entire aggregate, the Document's Cover Texts may be placed on
covers that bracket the Document within the aggregate, or the
electronic equivalent of covers if the Document is in electronic form.
Otherwise they must appear on printed covers that bracket the whole


Translation is considered a kind of modification, so you may
distribute translations of the Document under the terms of section 4.
Replacing Invariant Sections with translations requires special
permission from their copyright holders, but you may include
translations of some or all Invariant Sections in addition to the
original versions of these Invariant Sections.  You may include a
translation of this License, and all the license notices in the
Document, and any Warranty Disclaimers, provided that you also include
the original English version of this License and the original versions
of those notices and disclaimers.  In case of a disagreement between
the translation and the original version of this License or a notice
or disclaimer, the original version will prevail.

If a section in the Document is Entitled "Acknowledgements",

"Dedications", or "History", the requirement (section 4) to Preserve
its Title (section 1) will typically require changing the actual


You may not copy, modify, sublicense, or distribute the Document except
as expressly provided for under this License.  Any other attempt to
copy, modify, sublicense or distribute the Document is void, and will
automatically terminate your rights under this License.  However,
parties who have received copies, or rights, from you under this
License will not have their licenses terminated so long as such
parties remain in full compliance.


The Free Software Foundation may publish new, revised versions
of the GNU Free Documentation License from time to time.  Such new
versions will be similar in spirit to the present version, but may
differ in detail to address new problems or concerns.  See

Each version of the License is given a distinguishing version number.
If the Document specifies that a particular numbered version of this
License "or any later version" applies to it, you have the option of
following the terms and conditions either of that specified version or
of any later version that has been published (not as a draft) by the
Free Software Foundation.  If the Document does not specify a version
number of this License, you may choose any version ever published (not
as a draft) by the Free Software Foundation.

ADDENDUM: How to use this License for your documents

To use this License in a document you have written, include a copy of
the License in the document and put the following copyright and
license notices just after the title page:

Copyright (c)  YEAR  YOUR NAME.
Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document
under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2
or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation;
with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts.
A copy of the license is included in the section entitled "GNU
Free Documentation License".

If you have Invariant Sections, Front-Cover Texts and Back-Cover Texts,
replace the "with...Texts." line with this:

with the Invariant Sections being LIST THEIR TITLES, with the
Front-Cover Texts being LIST, and with the Back-Cover Texts being LIST.

If you have Invariant Sections without Cover Texts, or some other
combination of the three, merge those two alternatives to suit the

If your document contains nontrivial examples of program code, we
recommend releasing these examples in parallel under your choice of
free software license, such as the GNU General Public License,
to permit their use in free software.

See other Wikimedian needs.

8 Responses to “Everything You Always Wanted to Know About Wikipedia* (*But Were Afraid to Ask)”

  1. […] the document. I’ll announce updates as posts and the latest version of the document will be here. I found that a lot of people outside of Wikipedia (and a lot of them inside) don’t know to […]

  2. Don’t cite from Wikipedia at all? While a good rule of thumb because some students will always do it wrong — or for the wrong reasons, I onsider it a case of throwing the baby out with the bathwater. One of the most popular on my blog is “When
    to cite from an encyclopedia — even though you’re not supposed to”
    , which discusses the problem in far more depth. And before anyone starts to claim that I am undermining the authority of the teacher in the classroom, let me repeat one of the most important points from this essay:

    if you want to use one of these exceptions, … ask your professor first.

    Good teachers will understand the reasons for this exception — okay, I hope they will, because everyone has their blind spots.


  3. Thanks, Geoff! I am preparing v1.1 and I’ll include link to your post in the new version.

  4. […] EYAWKAW, update to 1.1 I made some updates to the FAQ Everything You Always Wanted to Know About Wikipedia* (*But Were Afraid to Ask). You may find full text here. […]

  5. […] Everything You Always Wanted to Know About Wikipedia* (*But Were Afraid to Ask), v1.2 I made a lot of updates and it doesn’t have a lot of sense to send an update. So, here is the version 1.2.1. Note that the latest version is still there. […]

  6. […] You Always Wanted to Know About Wikipedia, Appendix A This document is a part of the document Everything You Always Wanted to Know About Wikipedia* (*But Were Afraid to Ask). Here is the list of interesting documents related to Wikipedia (in alphabetical order). Note that […]

  7. […] First order kinetics which I mentioned as a joke inside of the document Everything You Always Wanted to Know About Wikipedia still doesn’t […]

  8. can you tell when a Wikipedia article was (first) written(and not revised)?

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: